Friday, May 8, 2015

Review Questions 6-10; Agency - Chapter One

Chapter One
Agency
Review Questions 6-10

6. What duties does an agent owe the principal?
Duty to perform (if compensated)- the duty to act in the best interests of the principal requires the agent to use his due diligence and skill to negotiate terms of a transaction on behalf of his principal with a third party to the greatest advantage of his principal in the circumstances.  The example of a real estate agent for the seller or buyer must act in the best interest of the principal in which they work for.

Duty to act with reasonable care - An agent is obligated to use reasonable care and diligence when pursuing the principal's affairs. The standard of care expected of a buyer's or seller's real estate broker is that of a competent real estate professional. By reason of his/her license, a broker is considered to have skill and expertise in real estate matters superior to that of the average person.

Fiduciary duty – a real estate broker is held by law to owe specific duties to his/her principal (the person who they are representing), in addition to duties or obligations set forth in the listing agreement, buyer representation agreement, or other contract of employment.

Duty to notify – An agent must disclose to the principal all known relevant and material information that pertains to the scope of the agency.

Duty of loyalty - Obligates a real estate broker to act at all times, solely in the best interests of the principal, excluding all other interests, including that of the broker.

7. Under what circumstances may a principal be liable for torts committed by his or her agent?
The principal is liable for the torts of the agent which are committed within the scope of the authority.
EXAMPLE: Mike, the owner of a produce business, directs Alan, his employee to make a delivery to a customer using the company truck. Mike knows that the truck’s brakes do not work properly. Alan does not know this and has no reason or duty to know it. Peter, a pedestrian, is injured when the truck’s brakes fail while Alan is driving the truck to make the delivery and attempts to stop at a stop sign. Mike is subject to the liability of Peter. Alan is not subject to the liability of Peter.

8. What is Respondent Superior?
Describes the principle that an employer is responsible for most harm caused by an employee acting within the scope of employment.

EXAMPLE: A surgical technician had stolen a surgical pain medicine and replaced it with used syringes filled with saline, ongoing for a period of several months.  The hospital where she worked is being sued under respondeat superior for permitting this to occur, despite their lack of awareness of the employee’s behavior.  The lawsuit claims that the hospital “knew or should have known that the public could suffer foreseeable harm if its employees, agents, independent contractors and/or servants, including [the surgical technician], failed to perform their assigned duties in a safe, skillful and competent manner”.  Despite the fact that the employee acted outside of the permissible behavior of employees of the hospital, and showed criminal and negligent behavior, the employer is still liable for those actions.

9. Who are the agents for a general partnership?
Each general partner is deemed the agent of the partnership. Therefore, if that partner is apparently carrying on partnership business, all general partners; they can be held liable for their dealings with third persons.

10. Who are the agents for a corporation?

The agents of the corporation are generally considered to be the board of directors, officers or other persons the corporation authorizes to act on its behalf.

No comments:

Post a Comment